“Take back our government in 2010.”

There is currently a movement in America to take back our government, restore our pride, and reinvigorate the “American Dream.”  This movement is embodied by the Tea Party, the rise of associations like GOOOH, the current popularity of the conservative pundits and the growing vocalization which occurs at town hall meetings, on the radio, and on television.  We can see this movement around us with the success of the march on Washington in April; the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and of course, Massachusetts.  There is a cry resounding, “Take back our government in 2010.”

However, what is the real likely hood of this effort really producing results?  Currently the “movement” has no clear leader, it has no clear structure and counting on the GOP to galvanize, reinvent itself and take care of business is optomistic at best.  The turnover of the house in 2006 and the election of 2008 did not signal a shift toward the left as much as it signaled a reaction to politics as usual.  Unfortunately we got more, politics as usual and very little of the “change” we were promised.  The American public is built on being an individual, and up to this point it was impossible for large masses of individuals to accomplish much of anything.  This movement, the Tea Party movement, is exactly that.  This is a movement of individuals that is intersecting to voice a collective opinion, individuals screaming loudly that we are going the wrong way.

So the question must posed, what can we really change in 2010 at this point.  According to Rasmussen Reports Democratic incumbents who currently trail their challengers include: Harry Reid in Nevada, Michael Bennet in Colorado, Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas and Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania. Barbara Boxer from California finds herself in a more competitive race than usual.  Republicans lead open-seat races in Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota and Ohio. Democrats lead in Connecticut, and the race is close in Illinois. A commentary by political analyst Larry Sabato, suggests that if the election were held today, “the (59-seat) Democratic majority in the Senate would be reduced to just 52 seats.”

Reducing the majority in the Senate is a good start, but is it enough will this affect the “hope and change” that the American people are looking for.  Recently our President announced that he does not give up and we will not veer from the course.  He boldly stated that we need to address the challenges before us, and he is picking the challenges.  One would expect that he will continue with his agenda, he will still have control of both houses, the media, and be setting the agenda.

So what can Americans of today do to get the message across that we want substantial “change.”  Nationalizing our industrial base, nationalizing our major corporations, taking over our health care industry and subsidizing the financial community is simply not the kind of “change” most of us were looking for.  We need to force this to stop and we have been shown a path to accomplish this by progressives now in office.  Several years ago Newt Gingrich took a nationalized message to every member of congress and successfully took control of the House and the Senate.  This movement was later derailed with scandals.  Tom Delay was removed as speaker through the use of the court system.  Sarah Palin was pushed out of the Governors seat through the use of the court system. The same tactics may have something to do with the recent announcement of Rep Steve Buyer who’s foundation has come under scruteny. While the actions of those who used this system seem scandalous they provide us with valuable lessons.  We can use these tools to our advantage as well.

So the question must be asked, would you contribute money to pursue the traitors/felons in Congress in Court to stop them stealing your money and destroying your country?

Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Do you believe the elected representatives have violated their oath of office

Yes or No

What is Treason?

Treason. A breach of allegiance to one's government, usually committed through levying war against such government or by giving aid or comfort to the enemy. The offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. Treason consists of two elements: adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort. Cramer v. U. S., U.S.N.Y., 325 U.S. l, 65 S.Ct. 918, 9327 89 L.Ed. 1441. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 2381. A person can be convicted of treason only on the testimony of two witnesses, or confession in open court. Art. III, Sec. 3, U.S. Constitution.

Do you favor legal proceeding against elected officials for treason?

Yes or NO

Please indicate which top 5 officials should be prosecuted:

Harry Reid,

Nancy Pelosy,

Barbara Boxer

Barney Frank,

Ken Salizar,

John kerry,

Ben Nelson,

Mary Landrue

All of the above

Do you favor a legal challenge to health care legislation on the basis it violates the constitution for Congress to be involved with this issue?

Do you favor a legal challenge to immigration reform as currently outlined by congress as a violation of their oath to defend the country?

Do you favor legal action against illegal acts of elected representatives for abuse of office, improper use of funds and wasteful spending?

Do you favor further legal proceeding to force President Obama to demonstrate his eligibility to hold the office of President?

Do you favor pursuit of legal actions of election fraud against those elected officials whose responsibility it is to document eligibility if it is proven he is not qualified to serve?